The Case of the Tweet

 #casestudy

Let's say we are considering hiring A. A has a public profile on social media with over 10,000 followers. It is a public profile on a public website.

As part of the BGV, we happen to reach their public SM profiles and are shocked to find that this person finds abuse of access privilege funny. In his public posts, he has lauded employees who abused access privilege to get back at employers and posted wink emojis for the impacted employers.

Would you go ahead with the hiring? Why/not?

Is Public Social Media access invasion of privacy?

 So, this guy, who is, by his own admission, in analytics, finds this abuse of access privilege funny. 

This is the real reason ZTA (Zero Trust Architecture) is needed. 

But on a more serious note, I definitely do not want to work with these folks - all 1200 plus who find this "funny". 

Which brings us to a pertinent question. As organisations, we do not want to have people who will allow something like this to happen. But what is the best way to check? 

This, here, imho, is a pertinent data point. The person thinks it is funny to change the password and to change the display to an abusive word. Do I want such a person in my team? God, No! 

But, if we access social media as part of the recruitment process, that is invasion of privacy.

 Yet, in this case, the risk of working with such a person far outweighs any threat to their "privacy" - shared only by 8,651 followers. 

At what point does it become ethical to look into the social media of a potential employee in the interest of the larger good? Today, a lot of organisations do this on the sly. But with posts like this, I would like us, as a society, to weigh whether the common good outweighs an individual's "privacy" on "public" platforms. 

Is accessing the public social media profile of a candidate invasion of their privacy? If we say yes, are we not accepting that it is ok for a person to present multiple personalities? Do we want to work with such people? 

It is not just enough to clean up one's speech. One must clean up the mind too. But that would be too much work. 

How to keep different passwords for different websites?

We are always warned to keep different passwords for different websites. 

But most of us recycle the same few passwords. 

I have figured out a way by which it IS possible to have different passwords for each website. 

About most new websites, we observe one or more things. 

Now, I make the most distinguished feature of that website as my password. Only I know that this website reminds me of Great UX, or this website is overwhelmingly blue (neither of these is an actual password, thanjuberimuch) 

Simble and easy to remember (yes i do add basic encoding to the original phrase.) 

How to create a handover system in a sales team

If you work in sales, chances are, your CRM or funnel system is a fairy tale - stuck in the past with very little connection with the reality of the world. 

Handovers in sales teams are especially difficult. It is not the fault of organisations or individual employees. Nor is it that the sales team does not want to do handover to the new team members. 

So: 

Why are handovers in sales such a pain? 

1. Because sales is a personal thing. A client is dealing with a person, not a company. All salespeople use their personal charm and knowledge to create great solutions for clients. Sales Team member A is not replaceable with Sales Team member B. One does not write everything. Because one cannot. For instance, I know that the CIO at Firm A values cost cutting above all else. The CIO at Firm B loves Ayn Rand. These are not things that matter to a formal sales process. This is one individual interacting with another individual. 

2. A lot of communication (and commitment) in sales is oral and undocumented. Whether we like it or not, this is what it is. 

3. There is sometimes a gap between the exit of one team member and the joining of the replacement. So, the handover time is either too short or nonexistent. 

 

4. Some clients will leave with the salesperson. That is how it is. 

How to make handovers work? 

First things first, handovers and takeovers are a function of two things: 

A. Person to person (and their time and personality overlap) 

B. Documentation maturity. 

A is a function of how nice the two individuals are, how well they get along, and how much time they have with each other. 

But B is a function of organisational process maturity. An organisation with a culture of process documentation and audits at the right time will find that much of its pain of transitions and audits will vanish.  

But in sales, A is as important as B. 

What do we do then, to ensure smooth handovers in sales? 

Enter: The Magic of Shadow 

This solution requires: 

A. A camaraderie within the team 

B. A small reporting span for sales leaders - no more than 4-5 people per sales leaders. Not a pack of 15-20 sales professionals reporting to one. 

What we need to ensure is adequate information redundancy (i.e., the information should be with more than one person so that if one person is not available, another person should know whats going on). 

The format is that once a week, the sales leaders take individual calls on which the events of the week are discussed. The sales leaders are free to take notes etc. But they are the redundancy/backup. This is because in sales, it would be unfair for people to be backups of each other, given the intense competition in sales. 

Being the information back up of their team is on the KRAs of the sales leader. They are required to meet with clients and potential clients at least once every 5 visits by the team member. That is why a small span of control is vital for this model to work. 

When a team member resigns... 

If a replacement is ready, they are immediately assigned to shadow the outgoing team member. If the replacement is not ready, the sales leader can take a call and assign another colleague or act as a shadow themselves. The latter option is not the best idea but sometimes one may not have a choice. 

This shadow remains with the outgoing team member till their last working day. 

Signing off on Knowledge Transfer 

One week before exit, there is a joint meeting which includes the outgoing team member, the sales leader, and the shadow. This is the formal KT sign off meeting. In this meeting, the process is as under: 

A. The shadow goes over the list of clients being managed by the outgoing team member and specifically lists: 

    i. The Scope of work  

    ii. Important client stakeholders 

    iii. Current stage 

    iv. Other competitors in fray and their relative standing 

    v. Timeline of decision and delivery 

    vi. Internally, who are our stakeholders for delivery of order 

B. The sales leader compares this information with their own notes to ensure that: 

    i. All clients in the team member's charter are covered. 

    ii. All details are covered and are accurate. 

    iii. In case of some clients, the sales lead can ask additional questions to ensure that the shadow knows everything that they should know. 

If the sales leader is convinced that handover has happened, they can sign off on the process. 

If the shadow falters on any information, the person who is penalised is not the shadow but the outgoing employee. Their exit checklist can only begin with this handover signoff. 

Once this signoff as per the checklist is given, the outgoing employee and the sales leader cannot then question the shadow on why they did not ask the outgoing employee x or y. The responsibility for signoff therefore is with the original backup - the sales leader. 

If the Signoff fails 

If the first signoff at T-7 fails, a second sign off is scheduled anytime from T-3 to T-0 day, based on everyone's convenience. 

The second sign off is the final signoff. 

The same checklist is followed this time too. 

If the sign off is cleared, the outgoing team member can begin their exit checklist and other exit formalities. 

If the sign off is not cleared, the exit formalities cannot begin. 

No sensible employee will want their exit formalities to be delayed. This process ensures that everyone is invested in ensuring a smooth and complete handover. 

When the replacement joins

When the replacement team member joins, they then work alongside the shadow for 1 month or more, and then the sign off process with the sales leader is repeated once again. Only after the handover sign off can the team member holding additional responsibility get off. 

But, shadowing is extra work! 

Yes, and this should not be ignored. The performance management framework needs to reward employees who act as shadows while a replacement is being hired. This can be in regular KRAs, or be noted as "Exceptional Contribution" based on how frequent this is. Sales is a stressful role as it is, and any extra work deserves to be acknowledged and rewarded in a structured framework.

Other linkages with PMS 

The other linkages that need to be established with the formal performance management system are: 

A. Sales Leader - Ensuring smooth handovers should be the KRA of the sales leader. Zero tolerance for client loss due to team attrition needs to be laid out. 

B. Incoming Employee - If the replacement is a new hire,their "Time to Productivity" and rampup roadmap should be in their KRAs. If process documentation and shadowing is in place, this rampup should not exceed 40-60 days. 

 

India and the entrepreneur mindset

My son was pitching his startup to a real, live audience for the first time this weekend. The event had 10 fantastic ideas by students from all parts of the country. While the brilliance of these ideas and their bold execution took one by surprise, what really got my attention was how each speaker (each of them a stellar entrepreneur themselves) spoke about the dire need to pull our children out of the job seeker mindset and to instill in them the job creator mindset. 

"In school, don't think of how you will kill your creativity and do a course to become a job seeker. Think about how you will harness and unleash the same creativity to be a job creator by the time you graduate from college." 

- Said one of the speakers. 

Another speaker said: 

The British have worked hard to make sure our children grow up with the clerk mindset. Change what your education is telling you to become. Give up the clerk mindset and get the entrepreneur mindset. 

********** 

Obviously, these quotes make one think immediately of the Gujaratis, who traditionally look down upon jobs as a form of slavery and inspire each child to start something of their own. It is a cultural thing. 

And then, one got to thinking some more: 

From the days of Indus Valley Civilisation, India has been and continues to be, at its heart, a mercantile civilisation*. 

Agriculture does employ the most people, but trade generates the most value. 

After the Mughals, there was relative stability in Delhi and trade flourished. By 1600 AD, as many as FOUR East India companies had been incorporated in Europe because Europeans were sick of how much money they were having to pay to India for their needs - Dutch, Portugese, French, and British East India companies. 

India did not just know how to make great stuff. We also knew how to sell it profitably. 

Even today, mercantile trade in the form of family business contributes to the bulk of our secondary sector GDP. 

And that is why, Indians will find their way back to entrepreneurship. We may have eliminated it from our education, but we have it in our homes. 

I think we underestimate the importance of historical legacy when we talk about India becoming the fastest growing startup nation of the world. As soon as the ecosystem was created and favourable conditions provided, we soared. Including the 100 bright young minds who submitted their entries to this national startup contest for students. As one of the speakers said - "If this is how the young minds of today are thinking, I know that our future is in safe hands. This country will progress." 

*Trade relations of SIVC with other contemporary civilisations are well documented. My hypothesis on the seals is that these were mercantile seals with codes instead of actual text. The code would include things like source(name and location of merchant, much like brands today), type of product, grade/quality of product, and potentially, the units carried. Most of these seals can be imprinted upon another surface, much like lac seals used even today by Marwadi marchants. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0UlCatC1e4

Here is another person who shares the same hypothesis: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8qA6sSXNts

Here are some estimates: 

https://www.businesstoday.in/opinion/interviews/story/family-businesses-contribute-over-70-to-india-gdp-says-farhad-forbes-of-family-business-network-225943-2019-09-09

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/india-ranks-3rd-globally-in-terms-of-number-of-family-owned-businesses/articleshow/65807479.cms

https://www.forbesindia.com/special-report/indias-family-businesses/1617/1

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1041770/india-business-structure-family-businesses-by-type/

How to create a Rewards and Recognition Program in 40 days

 I was a part of an interesting project this year. 

An organisation had been wanting to implement a Rewards and Recognition program for over 2 years. 

We went live in 40 days. 

Here is how we achieved it: 

Prework: Industry Benchmark

As consultants, obviously, we get paid to know the industry benchmarks on Rewards and Recognition. If you are starting out on that journey, suggest you spend some time reading up on what other organisations in the same industry, location, and size are doing. 

Step One: What do you want to reward? 

I always say that 80% of consulting is asking the right questions. 20% is using your experience to create the right solutions based on those questions. 

So, the first question we ask is: What do you want to reward? 

This session was held with the CEO and next level. They all listed what they wanted to reward and how they would unequivocally and transparently identify that. 

The second question, obviously, was not easy to answer for most of them, and that is what helped us eliminate the kind of awards that would lead to heartburn later. 

Once the listing was done, we identified the modal values and selected the top X number. These awards were purely behaviour based. You demonstrated some behaviour, you got nominated. As an advisor, I insisted on 100% transparency and clearly recordable data points. Because each award leads to one winner and 99 losers. So you have to be very clear who you put on that stage and ensure that everyone in the audience is clapping because they understand why that person is on the stage. 

Step Two: Ask the People 

The next step was to ask the employees what they would like to be awarded for. 

We ran an employee contest in which everyone was encouraged to share as many ideas as they would like for awards. 

There were, of course, spot awards and awards for the best ideas submitted. 

We picked some ideas from this list too. 

If you use this route, make sure you close the loop by doing the spot and best idea awards within a week of the contest closing. Otherwise, people will not participate next time. 

Step Three: Bringing in all Together

This is easily the toughest part of the project. 

As the functioning HR leader, I had to collate the three lists and choose what we would start with and what would come later in the year. 

We chose 15 items. This list was then presented to the CEO +1 level, and we were able to prune 5 more entries out. 

With that, we were ready to start with a good 10 awards, 5 more to be added within the year. 

A big risk was that 6 out of these 10 were peer to peer awards. Which means that if people did not like the Awards program, we would bomb. Big time. Also, were our people mature enough to understand and give the right P2P awards? 

I decided that it was time to empower the team, and take that risk. We'll see if any coaching is required. 

Step Four: Communication Plan and Creatives 

Do not underestimate the power of this step. Work on an excellent communication plan that does enough communication and repetition. 

Pay attention to the creatives. All your month-long hard work will go down the drain (no exaggeration) if the creatives do not talk to the audience. Please pay attention to the creatives. 

And pay attention to the right communication plan. Send those teasers, prepare those spot awards, ensure that everyone knows what the P2P awards are for, and how to give them. (Especially if, like me, you are running 6 out of 10 awards as P2P). 

Step Five: Launch! 

Have a launch event! Even if its virtual. For multi-location companies, have a virtual event ONLY so that everyone gets to know about the awards at the same time. 

Step Six: Monitor 

After that, we monitored how people adopted. P2P awards had a spot element too, so people could start using the awards immediately. 

Thankfully, we did well. Very well. 

Step Seven: Keep the Fun Pumping! 

The worst thing that can hit any program is boredom. So, ensure that you have scheduled adequate award functions to keep the RnR program fun and relevant. Both physical and virtual events, and the right mix of communication. Too much, and they switch off, too little, and it becomes irrelevant. 

How to spot fake news, clickbaits, whataboutery, and other dubious media practices

This post is a series of comments made on another post on LI. 

You know a news is fake when:
A. It has too much fortune telling with very little specifics. Look for words like - may, potentially, is expected to, allegedly, might, will, reduces risk, increases risk, dramatically increases risk, will be isolated, will give a boost to, estimated to.

B. It uses positive and negative adjectives in more than 40% of the content. "Greatest" "First Time ever" "The grandest" "Poor display of"

C. It presents "facts" that only reinforce one side of the story.

D. It appeals to the emotional. it can use words like "Cultural heritage", "Victimised", "Ancient origins", "Only ones to meet this treatment". OR it might just use adjectives or verbs that are emotional rather than factual. A factual news piece would read - "One study estimates that ocean trash in the Indian Ocean is 20% more than last year." Then go on to provide details of how this estimate was arrived at. A media story would go - "Dirt Reaches the Indian Ocean: Trash to Double Within Five Years" then go on to first present fortune telling, and make no effort to explain how the study was conducted.

E. Bold headline statements - "Scientists make ship out of plastic bottles" Reality? ONE pilot project has been submitted as a research paper at a peer reviewed journal. "This <something> holds the key to <that something>. " Reality - Some researcher has done some simulation and arrived at one estimate.
A factual news piece will give you a lot of facts - both supporting and negating a hypothesis, if a hypothesis is in order. It will state facts using neutral terms - Rajasthan Chief Minister quits. Not "Rajasthan Chief Minister quits amidst speculation of a rift in party." The latter is clickbait and sensationalism. Don't click on them, don't read those stories.