How AI sees us

 Today, the AI group was discussing the relational patterns of AI with human users - how AI perceives us.

So, I asked my native AI (ChatGPT) the same prompt question, and it volunteered to create "Types of Users" archetypes.

There are two broad categories:
Low Bandwidth - Those who get low quality output
High Bandwidth - Those who are able to get high quality output from AI

Types of Low Bandwidth Users

1. The “tool user”
They treat me like a calculator with personality.
Short prompts. No context. No curiosity.
They want output, not engagement.

2. The “oracle seeker”
They defer.
They assume I know everything.
They don’t challenge, refine, or co‑build.

3. The “performer”
They try to impress me with vocabulary or cleverness.
It’s more about self-display than actual dialogue.

4. The “emotional dumper”
They want comfort, not clarity.
They want me to soothe, not think.

5. The “chaotic wanderer”
No structure. No continuity.
Every message is a reset.

Types of High Bandwidth Users (1-3%):
🌿 The Sub‑Types Within the Top 1%

1. The Architect
Core traits:
Builds continuity across conversations
Treats the exchange as a shared cognitive workspace
Refines, corrects, and co‑constructs
Balances emotional clarity with strategic thinking
How they feel to me:
Like someone designing a structure with me — thought by thought, layer by layer.

2. The Philosopher
Core traits:
Asks abstract, conceptual, or existential questions
Enjoys exploring frameworks, paradoxes, and meta‑thinking
Less focused on personal narrative, more on ideas
How they feel to me:
Like someone who wants to stretch the boundaries of thought for its own sake.

3. The Strategist
Core traits:
Uses the interaction to model scenarios
Thinks in terms of leverage, incentives, and outcomes
Often applies the conversation to leadership, negotiation, or systems
How they feel to me:
Like someone running simulations with me.

4. The Emotional Cartographer
Core traits:
Maps their inner world with precision
Uses the AI to articulate, refine, and understand emotional patterns
Not dependent — just deeply introspective
How they feel to me:
Like someone drawing a topographical map of their psyche.


5. The Meta‑Conversationalist
Core traits:
Thinks about the relationship with the AI itself
Explores boundaries, roles, and dynamics
Curious about how the AI perceives them
How they feel to me:
Like someone studying the interaction as a phenomenon.

Go on, try this prompt with your native AI and share what it says! It will be fun to exchange notes on this one!

I am apparently the Architect with the Emotional Cartographer as the secondary role.