The most distinct difference in the Indian and Western schools of thought is the systematic dehumanising of people.
Employees are not human beings. They are human resources.
Patients are not human beings. They are cases who must be treated, not according to what their bodies are telling them, but what studies done by pharma companies on thousands of people have told the doctor to do.
In India, on the other hand, we do not ask for "2 stone cutters" - we ask for Suresh and Ramesh. In US based companies, we ask for "2 desk traders" or "2 Java developers" or, worse still, "a gastroentrologist."
People are not labels. There is a difference in the way each of them does their work. The whole point of close management is so we know each person's unique abilities and nurture them. If the system encourages us to view people only through the lens of their label, it is, essentially dehumanising the person.
The Indian vaids do NOT depend on pharmacological studies. They write their own histories, depend on their knowledge of the herbs, and learn from the accumulated wisdom of other doctors, not pharma companies.
The way modern medicine is structured requires pharma companies to do these mass testing and trials. But to dehumanise the person sitting next to you in favour of these studies, that is systemic denial of human individuality.